-
 KDE-Apps.org Applications for the KDE-Desktop 
 GTK-Apps.org Applications using the GTK Toolkit 
 GnomeFiles.org Applications for GNOME 
 MeeGo-Central.org Applications for MeeGo 
 CLI-Apps.org Command Line Applications 
 Qt-Apps.org Free Qt Applications 
 Qt-Prop.org Proprietary Qt Applications 
 Maemo-Apps.org Applications for the Maemo Plattform 
 Java-Apps.org Free Java Applications 
 eyeOS-Apps.org Free eyeOS Applications 
 Wine-Apps.org Wine Applications 
 Server-Apps.org Server Applications 
 apps.ownCloud.com ownCloud Applications 
--
-
 KDE-Look.org Artwork for the KDE-Desktop 
 GNOME-Look.org Artwork for the GNOME-Desktop 
 Xfce-Look.org Artwork for the Xfce-Desktop 
 Box-Look.org Artwork for your Windowmanager 
 E17-Stuff.org Artwork for Enlightenment 
 Beryl-Themes.org Artwork for the Beryl Windowmanager 
 Compiz-Themes.org Artwork for the Compiz Windowmanager 
 EDE-Look.org Themes for your EDE Desktop 
--
-
 Debian-Art.org Stuff for Debian 
 Gentoo-Art.org Artwork for Gentoo Linux 
 SUSE-Art.org Artwork for openSUSE 
 Ubuntu-Art.org Artwork for Ubuntu 
 Kubuntu-Art.org Artwork for Kubuntu 
 LinuxMint-Art.org Artwork for Linux Mint 
 Arch-Stuff.org Art And Stuff for Arch Linux 
 Frugalware-Art.org Themes for Frugalware 
 Fedora-Art.org Artwork for Fedora Linux 
 Mandriva-Art.org Artwork for Mandriva Linux 
--
-
 KDE-Files.org Files for KDE Applications 
 OpenTemplate.org Documents for OpenOffice.org
 GIMPStuff.org Files for GIMP
 InkscapeStuff.org Files for Inkscape
 ScribusStuff.org Files for Scribus
 BlenderStuff.org Textures and Objects for Blender
 VLC-Addons.org Themes and Extensions for VLC
--
-
 KDE-Help.org Support for your KDE Desktop 
 GNOME-Help.org Support for your GNOME Desktop 
 Xfce-Help.org Support for your Xfce Desktop 
--
openDesktop.orgopenDesktop.org:   Applications   Artwork   Linux Distributions   Documents    LinuxDaily.com    Linux42.org    OpenSkillz.com   
 
Artwork
News
Groups
Knowledge
Events
Forum
People
Jobs
Register
Login


Sponsoring


-
- Content .- Fans (3) .- Knowledge Base  . 

Outcrop

   1.1  

GTK 2.x Theme/Style

Score 73%
Outcrop
zoom


Link:  Link
Downloads:  8927
Submitted:  Jan 15 2005
Updated:  Sep 19 2005

Changelog:


1.1 (19-Sep-2005)
------
+ pixmap size bug has been fixed (thx 2 lusken)
+ some optimisation has been made
+ menuitem pixmap has been polished

1.0 (16-Sep-2005)
------
+ total retouch




LicenseGPL
Send to a friend
Subscribe
Other  Artwork  from w-Tarchalski
Report inappropriate content



goto page: prev   1  2  3  4  5 

-

 shadow-gap.png???

 
 by Lupine925 on: Jan 16 2005
 
Score 50%

First off, beautiful job, thx!!!

I'm seeing a problem with shadow-gap.png file, as it does not exist. When launching something from terminal, I get:



/usr/share/themes/Outcrop/gtk-2.0/gtkrc:97: Unable to locate image file in pixmap_path: "shadow-gap.png"
/usr/share/themes/Outcrop/gtk-2.0/gtkrc:107: Background image options specified without filename



I checked out "/usr/share/themes/Outcrop/gtk-2.0/gtkrc" file and on line 97 it refers to a "shadow-gap.png" file, however that file does is not the one in "/usr/share/themes/Outcrop/gtk-2.0/". The file that is in "/usr/share/themes/Outcrop/gtk-2.0/" is called shadow.png Once I renamed this file to shadow-gap.png the errors stopped. Was this the right thing to do?


Reply to this

-
.

 Re: shadow-gap.png??

 
 by w-Tarchalski on: Jan 17 2005
 
Score 50%

oh no,
I am sorry -- my fault -- it should be called prerelease (0.0).

rename 'shadow-gap.png' to 'empty.png'

Thaks for info!


Reply to this

-

 Re: shadow-gap.png??

 
 by w-Tarchalski on: Jan 19 2005
 
Score 50%

already fixed :)


Reply to this

-

 Absolutely beautiful

 
 by mschwartz on: Jan 19 2005
 
Score 50%

This is gorgeous!

I liked the first go around and this new version is impressive!

Two things:

1. There is something just a little "funny" in the upper left hand corner of the scrollbar handle. Can't tell what it is, but you can see it in the new preview. Looks almost like it is dog-eared.

2. Any consideration for putting together an xfwm4 theme for those of us using Xfce? The metacity theme adds a nice sense of depth to the overall theme, which is not available under Xfce's WM themes.

Thanks for the great work!


Reply to this

-

 Re: Absolutely beaut

 
 by w-Tarchalski on: Jan 19 2005
 
Score 50%

ad1.
Geez, thanks!
already fixed -- will upload immediately!

ad2.
I am sorrry, but I've had nothing to do with xfce ever -- do not know how to make borders 4 xfce :(

but I'm glad u liked the theme :)


Reply to this

-

 Great!

 
 by mschwartz on: Jan 19 2005
 
Score 50%

Thanks for the quick reply. Looks better... :-)

On the xfwm4 themes, would you be interested in a pointer to a How-To? There is one at the Xfce site.

Let me know. If not, I would certainly understand.

Thanks again for the great work!


Reply to this

-

 Re: Great!

 
 by w-Tarchalski on: Jan 19 2005
 
Score 50%

I won't make the xfce theme I am afraid (hate learning :D), but the link would be handy -- just in case :)


Reply to this

-

 Re: Great!

 
 by mschwartz on: Jan 19 2005
 
Score 50%

Any consideration you might have is appreciated.

The link is:

http://www.xfce.org/xfwm4-theme-howto/

The latest version of Xfce is 4.2 and some additional notes for WM theming are towards the bottom of the page.

Xfce uses GTK for it's UI, so we can utilize your GTK themes there, which I have enjoyed for some time.

I have no doubt that Xfce users would enjoy your WM themes greatly.

How's that for "sucking up".... ;-)

Thanks again for all of your hard work!


Reply to this

-

 >= 0.2

 
 by Cwiiis on: Jan 19 2005
 
Score 50%

I love this theme, its been a long time since I came across one so original and fresh, and first of all, I must give my congratulations!

But, (and there always is, isn't there? :p) I have to say I'm sticking with 0.1 - Although I don't mind that the theme has been lightened in the later versions, I very much dislike the changes to the scrollbar - I liked them being dark as they were in 0.1. Am I the only one with this opinion?


Reply to this

-

 Re: >= 0.2

 
 by bvc on: Jan 19 2005
 
Score 50%
bvcbvc
Home
-
Billy bvc 24

United States of America, Houston, Texas
Last visit Nov 7 2011
1 Friends
0 Groups

More info
Send a message
Add as friend
Other contents
--

no you're not the only one. While in something like rhythmbox the dark scrollbars *were a bit chaotic but that's expected given the scheme so I understood. Now, they don't fit the scheme at all IMO but I appreciate the effort to make it lighter. Too...Ana? The new light scrollbar takes way from its originality IMO. I still use .01 as well :)


Reply to this

-

 Re: >= 0.2

 
 by w-Tarchalski on: Jan 19 2005
 
Score 50%

My intention was not to make the scrollbars ligher, but to change them,
I'm not 100% satisfied too, so expect futher changes in scrollbar -- in certain direction :)


Reply to this

-

 Re: >= 0.2

 
 by w-Tarchalski on: Jan 19 2005
 
Score 50%

one more thing,
I also liked the dark scrollbar color more, but was (and still am) afraid, that it would be too contrast for 'Joe the user',
well I'll take a chance again :)


Reply to this

-

 Re: Re: >= 0.2

 
 by robsta on: Jan 19 2005
 
Score 50%

Hi Witek,

i must say i prefer the new scollbars. Exactly the change i've been hoping for since the ones from 0.1 were too dark for me.
You are doing very original stuff, that's for sure!

Rob "Joe" User


Reply to this

-

 Re: Re: Re: >= 0.2

 
 by Cwiiis on: Jan 19 2005
 
Score 50%

Perhaps easy-to-follow instructions to switch dark/light scrollbars are called for? Of course I'll wait to see what happens in future versions, I'm sure you have more imagination than me :) But for now, I'll stick with 0.1 - I can't really imagine the scrollbars getting much better than they are there :)


Reply to this

-

 Re: Re: Re: >= 0.2

 
 by w-Tarchalski on: Jan 19 2005
 
Score 50%

Ok, I'll confess.
Those scrollbars (0.1) so as the check and radio buttons, have been a part of my other, never published theme.
That's the reason of the confusion.

I've uploaded Outcrop, when it was not ready -- and have made new scrollbars in a hurry -- good shape, but wrong color sheme.


Reply to this

-

 Re: Re: Re: Re: >= 0

 
 by bvc on: Jan 22 2005
 
Score 50%
bvcbvc
Home
-
Billy bvc 24

United States of America, Houston, Texas
Last visit Nov 7 2011
1 Friends
0 Groups

More info
Send a message
Add as friend
Other contents
--

love the new in 0.2.9!
rocks!


Reply to this

-

 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

 
 by bvc on: Jan 22 2005
 
Score 50%
bvcbvc
Home
-
Billy bvc 24

United States of America, Houston, Texas
Last visit Nov 7 2011
1 Friends
0 Groups

More info
Send a message
Add as friend
Other contents
--

hehe...love how it comes together and forms the slit :D
nice!


Reply to this

-

 Great work!

 
 by arcterex on: Jan 20 2005
 
Score 50%

Great work, one comment I have though is that in Pan the task bars at the bottom (that move as files are downloaded or articles are loaded) don't really show up well as they blend too well into the background of it, without any real indication that there is a progress bar there, making this app look a bit odd.

Thanks!


Reply to this

-

 Re: Great work!

 
 by w-Tarchalski on: Jan 20 2005
 
Score 50%

If you meant, that there is no trough under the progress sider, then I must say:
"It's a feature, this theme just looks like that, it was intended"

If I missuderstood you, please explain again or show me a screenshot.


Reply to this

-

 Confusing checkers

 
 by vanyar on: Jan 20 2005
 
Score 50%

Great theme, but there's a problem at least for me when checking a multiple checker (the sqare one, not the round one) it's very very difficult to see if it's checked or not. You could make something more different for a checked and unchecked widget.


Reply to this

-
.

 Re: Confusing checke

 
 by w-Tarchalski on: Jan 20 2005
 
Score 50%

u're lucky, the check buttons (so as the option ones) are to be completely redrawn :)


Reply to this

-

 nice!

 
 by docomo on: Jan 21 2005
 
Score 50%

Very nice theme! What would you say about changing the text in the menu item that is selected to white, or light grey, so that it shows better against the grey?


Reply to this

-
.

 Re: nice!

 
 by bvc on: Jan 22 2005
 
Score 50%
bvcbvc
Home
-
Billy bvc 24

United States of America, Houston, Texas
Last visit Nov 7 2011
1 Friends
0 Groups

More info
Send a message
Add as friend
Other contents
--

then fg[PRELIGHT] wouldn't be seen in other widgets like buttons. It's an unfortunate limitation in pixmap/svg gtk themes. You can't choose a special color for many of the different widgets. The menuitem is one of the ones you can't...at this time.


Reply to this

goto page: prev   1  2  3  4  5 

Add commentBack






-
 
 
 Who we are
Contact
More about us
Frequently Asked Questions
Register
Twitter
Blog
Explore
Artwork
Jobs
Knowledge
Events
People
Updates on identi.ca
Updates on Twitter
Facebook App
Content RSS   
Events RSS   

Participate
Groups
Forum
Add Artwork
Public API
About GNOME-Look.org
Legal Notice
Spreadshirt Shop
CafePress Shop
Advertising
Sponsor us
Report Abuse
 

Copyright 2003-2014 GNOME-Look.org Team  
All rights reserved. GNOME-Look.org is not liable for any content or goods on this site.
All contributors are responsible for the lawfulness of their uploads.
GNOME and the foot logo are trademarks of the GNOME Foundation.